9/1/2023 0 Comments Wargame red dragon forumsSo pretty much the only addition would be a new name and flag to choose from. Originally posted by FadingCeiling:What would be the point of adding those new nations? They would bring pretty much no new units or units that would just be a "clone" of an already existing unit. Ninja edit: I wonder why the name of our thunder god is censored. So apart from the cool factor of infantry yelling "PERKELE" there really is no point (advantage) in trying to add Finland to WGRD. also you can read it as military "units"). Finland has a mix and match of both western and eastern military technology (using technology to refer to different vehicles, weapons systems, ordanance etc. Thirdly given the time frame of WGRD adding Finland really would not bring any new units to the game (see the above "clone" remark). Secondly, air units (choppers and planes) would be limited to a few units at most. Those are not modeled/not available in WGRD. Leave us the hell alone.įirstly, the FDF has a lot of mortars and field guns, mostly towed. Yes I am generalizing a lot here, there would be some exceptions in that list.įinland should NEVER EVER be a playable faction in WGRD. What would be the point of adding those new nations? They would bring pretty much no new units or units that would just be a "clone" of an already existing unit. More countries = More Options = More Fun = More Players = More Money! D Some people have said theirs no need to add more countries, but I think the more countries there is available will make the game more endless and give commanders a much larger variety of options to play and it also gives the worlds representatives from other countries to show there flag and fight in command of there countries fighting forces and show how well there countries can dish out pain and destruction on a battlefield. These countries should be added into a DLC or if someone would Mod them in would be pretty cool adding factions. It would also be pretty cool to add some other countries from around the world such as. These countries should be added to NATO/BLUFOR I also believe NATO should have more countries to allow more people from different countries to have more use of there desired units and faction and have a more diverse playing field. What countries do you think should be added and why? What alliance would they be apart of? What are your thoughts on the countries listed above? And which side do you think Finland should be on and why?įirst of I believe Finland should go NATO, due to the fact that Finland and Sweden plan to work more closely with NATO by signing a pact that allows assistance from alliance troops in the Nordic countries in emergency situations which kinda hints there NATO side I guess. Yugoslavia was communist, but it was independent and not a part of the Warsaw PACT.)īenelux: Belgium, The Netherlands, and Luxembourg- (A treaty signed by those three countries after WWII to help get there economies, and other things, back on track. On the Bluefor side, they were not apart of NATO, but neither was Sweden, but they were friendly with other European countries that were apart of NATO.)īalkan: Turkey, Greece, & Yugoslavia- (During the Cold War, the USSR wanted to get Turkey to be its ally so that the USSR would be able to move ships from the Black Sea to the Mediterranean Sea, but Turkey refused and signed a treaty with Greece and Yugoslavia. They were close friends with the USSR, but they were not communist and they were not apart of the Warsaw PACT. These are the ones that I think Eugen should add, and what alliance they would be a part of:įinland- Scandinavia or Pact/Eastern Block (I couldn't decide which side Finland should be apart of. I think that adding new nations to Wargame Red Dragon would be really cool.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |